Contact us
UA

Interactive Dashboard of Key Performance Indicators (KPIs)

We have collected and structured key customs performance indicators — from budget revenues and processing speed to security, transparency, and institutional development.

translation required
  • user-friendly format user-friendly format
  • open data open data
  • dynamic indicators dynamic indicators
  • regular updates regular updates
Statistical Indicators
Revenue Integrity
Trade Facilitation
Customs Enforcement

Dutiable Import Share

Imports

Goods entering Ukraine from abroad for sale, production, or consumption. They generate the bulk of customs revenues: duty, VAT, and excise tax.

  • Imports

    Imports

    Goods entering Ukraine from abroad for sale, production, or consumption. They generate the bulk of customs revenues: duty, VAT, and excise tax.

  • Share of Dutiable Imports

ToP Logo

Dutiable Imports,

MoF fiscal targets actual revenues from customs

  • Dutiable Imports

  • MoF fiscal targets

    translation required

  • Actual Collections

    translation required

Main Trade Partners

Import:

Export:

ToP Logo

Collection Efficiency -

share of customs-assessed to voluntary payments

Ratio of extra revenue raised through valuation, code, origin, or audit checks to total customs payments. Indicates fiscal return from control activities.

High score points to effective identification of errors and additional revenue collection.

  • Collection Efficiency

    Ratio of extra revenue raised through valuation, code, origin, or audit checks to total customs payments. Indicates fiscal return from control activities.

    High score points to effective identification of errors and additional revenue collection.

  • Customs Payments

    Customs Payments.

    All taxes and duties paid to the state when goods cross the border. Most commonly these include import duty, value-added tax (VAT), and excise. Customs payments make up a major share of state budget revenues.

  • Reassessments

    Reassessments.

    Extra amounts imposed by customs if the declared value, code, or origin of goods is found incorrect, or if post-clearance audits reveal discrepancies.

Fiscal Overreach -

ratio of upheld vs. overturned reassessments in courts

Fiscal Overreach

Measures the share of customs reassessments overturned in court among all disputed cases. A higher value may suggest insufficient justification for some reassessments. It reflects how well customs balances enforcement with fair treatment of taxpayers.

  • Fiscal Overreach %

    Fiscal Overreach

    Measures the share of customs reassessments overturned in court among all disputed cases. A higher value may suggest insufficient justification for some reassessments. It reflects how well customs balances enforcement with fair treatment of taxpayers.

Authorized Economic Operators Count

AEO is a trusted trader status granted by customs to businesses that meet high standards of compliance, financial reliability, and supply-chain security. AEOs enjoy simplified customs procedures, faster clearance, and fewer inspections.
Total AEOs
2024
▲ +55
from previous year
76
Total Companies with Simplifications
2024
▲ +135
from previous year
203

  • Total AEOs

  • Count of companies authorized for individual simplifications

    Businesses that have obtained individual procedural simplifications from customs - simpler or fewer formalities - without full AEO certification.

AEO Participation in Trade

AEO Participation in Trade.

Share of exports/imports handled by Authorised Economic Operators (AEOs).

A higher rate (↑) means most goods move through trusted supply chains, reducing fraud risk.

  • Share of imports

  • Share of exports

Processing Time

Processing Time

Speed of cargo processing at customs, grouping declarations by duration: under 1 h, under 4 h, under 24 h, and over 24 h.

A higher share of clearances within 1 h indicates greater efficiency and fewer business delays.
ToP Logo

Enforcement Effectiveness

share of enforcement decisions validated by courts

Enforcement Effectiveness

Number of court cases on customs offences won by customs.

Indicates the ability of customs to counter violations and defend the state’s interests in court.

Higher value means well-grounded actions and strong evidence in court.

Inspection Effectiveness

Inspection Effectiveness

Ratio of detected violations to total customs inspections. A higher rate means better targeting of risky shipments and fewer unnecessary checks.
Month
Share of Seizures
Physical Inspections

Seizures Count

More insights in our analytical materials

Explore
ToP Mailbox Illustration

Competition for the Head of Customs Appointment

Time elapsed since Stage 1:

14 months
3
4

Time spent at current Stage:

2 days
1. Preparation Stage
1.1 Selection Committee
1.2 Committee Members Appointment
1.3 List of Candidates
1.4 Approval of Committee Membership
1.5 Selection Committee Established
1.6 Selection Committee Chair Elected
2. Competitive Selection Procedure
2.1 Selection Committee Meeting
2.2 Committee's Rules of Procedure
2.3 Official Announcement of the Competition
2.4 Submission of Application Documents by Candidates
2.5 Preliminary Review of Documents by the Committee
2.6 General Competency Testing
2.7 Approval of Test Results
2.8 Test on Customs and Related Legislation
2.9 Approval of Legislative Knowledge Test Results
2.10 Practical Assignments by Candidates
2.11 Approval of Practical Assignment Results
3. Selection of the Successful Candidate
4. Appointment of the new Head of Customs

Current Stage

2.7 Approval of Test Results

Out of 38 candidates, 16 advanced to the next stage of the competition following the evaluation. Half of them are current or former customs officers, while the second-largest group consists of representatives of NABU. The next stage of the competition — a legal knowledge test — is scheduled for early February. At the same time, special background checks by the Security Service of Ukraine and integrity checks have already been launched and may continue up to the interview stage.

Sixteen made the cut, onward they went, yet not all them named the burden they cared.

This project was funded with the financial support of the European Union. Its content is the sole responsibility of the NGO "Institute of Analytics and Advocacy" and NGO "Technology of Progress" and does not necessarily reflect the views of the European Union

  • European Union in Ukraine
  • CSO "Institute of Analytics and Advocacy"
  • CSO "Technologies of Progress"